Welcome to E8 :: [eon8]

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll also be able to use the shoutbox, customize your profile, change themes, gain reputation points for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private messenger, plus much more!


This message will be removed once you have signed in.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About chibijesus

  • Rank
  • Birthday
  1. so yeah

    I don't think you understand the definition of proof. Yeah, bye. Don't go joining any debate teams.
  2. so yeah

    So, that second quote is enough for you to ignore the first quote where he straight up said he didn't see anything that indicated illegal activity? You argue like a child who plugs his ears and screams "nah nah nah, I can't hear you." Look, I've provided countless evidence on my behalf, and if all you can do is call me a child and scream "bias" then forget it. I'm not going to bother. You can continue to hold a baseless opinion.
  3. so yeah

    Please point me to that. Please, because I believe I'm the only one with cited sources of his father saying he whipped him and was happy that he threw up at his site because it made him money.
  4. so yeah

    So, in conclusion, your stance is: I won't do research. My childhood sucked too, but he had money (none of which he actually got to enjoy) so it's totally different. I like that you are proud to exercise such a sickening level of prejudice and ignorance. These are straight up quotes from HIS FATHER and THE PEOPLE WHO ACCUSED HIM OF MOLESTATION, but they're not enough for you because you don't want to even acknowledge the possibility that you may be wrong. PS: All the Wikipedia quotes have citations of their own on the sources. Pretty lame that your whole argument rests on the validity of Wipiedia.
  5. so yeah

    Oh, and here are some nice quotes from Martin Bashir, the starter of the michael-is-a-pedophile mentality. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2...15875-21475180/
  6. so yeah

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQwY4ll1Kfc Watch this too.
  7. so yeah

    Oh, and you want some facts? Fine. Here is an assload of CITED facts. I didn't think I'd have to go this far, but you seem pretty dense. http://www.examiner.com/x-14650-Entertainm...l-Jackson-death http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson http://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/...hildhood-abuse/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3268133.stm http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Story?id=116639 If you can read these and still call him a "horrible person," I feel sorry for you.
  8. so yeah

    Yeah. Clearly you have a grasp on pain when your understanding of happiness seems to be money.
  9. so yeah

    Yeah, working 24 hours a day in the studio, never getting to spend time with any friends, and getting beat and verbally abused by your father sounds like a fantastic childhood. Just give up man, you have no idea what you're talking about and are just making up facts to match the image you've created in your head.
  10. so yeah

    Oh, and pardon my swearing for hurting your virgin ears, but you likely see much more offensive things in the hours of hentai your weeaboo ass consumes.
  11. so yeah

    An opinion is usually based on evidence. If the cases of molestation were proven, why was he found not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury predisposed to think of him as a pedophile? The testimonies were shaky and contradictory, and the mother didn't even approve or believe the allegations that the father were trying to put forward. It was a text book cash grab initiated by an already great deal of character assassination by the media. Strange how the allegations popped up after the ABC interview that basically called him a pedophile, huh? As for the baby, he never said he was going to drop the baby. Not once. He wanted to show everybody his baby, an example of his child-like nativity. Again, this is you trying to fit behavior into your prejudiced view of the man. Michael Jackson had a shit childhood and it lead to severe mental imbalance. Did he have psychological issues? Of course he did. Did he molest kids? Not proven and not likely. The claim that he had mental problems which lead him to try and live a childhood he never got make a lot of sense when you consider all his other behavior. And I called you douche bags because it's people like you who ruin the lives of people like this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-...cried-rape.html He didn't rape anyone, and it was proven he didn't, but fucks like you who assume accusation = guilt ruin lives. Jerk off.
  12. so yeah

    Horrible person? In what sense? Some alleged cases of molestation that were never adequately proven beyond a reasonable doubt, resulting in total acquittal? You can't just assume anyone who has been accused of something is guilty. I'm going to go ahead and accuse you two of being douche bags. By your logic that makes it so.